Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ROSEN v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01446
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEN
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON.COM.CA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNEDGEN v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv01707
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. SNEDGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTHY et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
ELLEN MCCARTHY and MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY , ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. , AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01444
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DAVIS et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 1:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
JUDITH DAVIS and MICHAEL MICKALIGER
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REINHARDT v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REINHARDT
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHLEYER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02244
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHLEYER
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BALICE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02169
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BALICE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CONNOLLY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONNOLLY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv02442
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FECHO, MICHELE FECHO, MICHELE FECHO and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
