Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HAWKINS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03859
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER
Plaintiff:
CARLTON HAWKINS and MICHELLE A HAWKINS
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY INC, DEPUY INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRUESBECK v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, USA, INC et al
as 1:2020cv03716
Defendant:
TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC, TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, INC, TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ANN GRUESBECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv02442
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FECHO, MICHELE FECHO, MICHELE FECHO and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAMPBELL et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
DENISE CAMPBELL and MICHELLE D. NARUS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KOENIG et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02282
Plaintiff:
DENISE E. KOENIG, DANIEL M. LOVELACE, CARLA NOLAN and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02288
Plaintiff:
SHERRI LYNN MILLER, LAMONT MILLER, JERRY MONROE and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CUTHBERT et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02276
Plaintiff:
CHERYL CUTHBERT, MAX TIMOTHY HOUGH, MARCHA J. DILLON and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
BRAILLARD et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2007cv02097
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BRAILLARD and WALTER BRAILLARD
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
