Cases 91 - 100 of 1,388
Watts et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
Alexis C. Watts and William Ito
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whiteeagle et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Chaun T. Whiteeagle and Trisha Whiteeagle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whitmire v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02358
Plaintiff:
Janice R. Whitmire
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilken et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Jodi L. Wilken and Jeff Wilken
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yales et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02360
Plaintiff:
Martin Patrick Yales, Jr. and Sharon Ann Yales
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sczygelski v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Sczygelski
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearl v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02333
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Pearl
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huffman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02277
Plaintiff:
Franklin Huffman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCoy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Darcy McCoy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
