Cases 31 - 40 of 799
Clark v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Clark
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacobs et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01728
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jacobs and Amelia Jacobs
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keplinger et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01696
Plaintiff:
Edward Keplinger and Libby Keplinger
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ashby v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01688
Plaintiff:
Beverly Ashby
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ebsen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Glen Ebsen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01692
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James King
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
Melonie Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alves v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01699
Plaintiff:
Fabiano Alves
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bullock v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01703
Plaintiff:
Loretta Bullock
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santana v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Ana Santana
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
