Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Franklin v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05098
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Franklin
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Franklin et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03705
Plaintiff:
Emily Franklin and Matthew Hughes
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Franklin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02931
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Diana Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eytcheson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05957
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Franklin Eytcheson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02054
Plaintiff:
Dennis Franklin Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANKLIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv02080
Plaintiff:
Connie Franklin and Marvin Franklin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANKLIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 4:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANKLIN and MARVIN FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01053
Plaintiff:
Franklin Gibson
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Redd v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02514
Plaintiff:
Pamela Franklin Redd
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Franklin v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02199
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Franklin
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
