Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Ramzan v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02827
Plaintiff:
Virginia Lisa Ramzan
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bentzel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02522
Plaintiff:
Virginia Bentzel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeSantis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01853
Plaintiff:
Virginia B. DeSantis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montgomery v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01765
Plaintiff:
Virginia Montgomery
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Costanzo v. DePuy International Limited et al.
as 1:2023dp20030
Plaintiff:
Virginia Costanzo
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Venturini v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04366
Plaintiff:
Virginia Venturini
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cole et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04330
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Cole and Virginia Cole
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cooley v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04273
Plaintiff:
Virginia Cooley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pellegrin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02586
Plaintiff:
Virginia Pellegrin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen and Virginia Allen
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
