Cases 11 - 20 of 51
GILL et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65230
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EMORY GILL and MARGARET C GILL
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINSTON v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65200
Plaintiff:
LENORA WINSTON
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERS et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64779
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S PETERS and JANET PETERS
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZABOROWSKI et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65177
Plaintiff:
CHESTER J ZABOROWSKI and JOAN ZABOROWSKI
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BINFORD v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64826
Plaintiff:
HELEN BINFORD
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCIOTTI v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64594
Plaintiff:
MADELINE E SCIOTTI
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PLEAT et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65227
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W PLEAT and CLARICE E PLEAT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, ET AL
as 2:2011cv66178
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR E CAMPBELL and ALICE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENT et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65928
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH F. KENT, SR. and MARGUERITE KENT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN ZANDT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET AL
as 2:2011cv66186
Plaintiff:
FRANCE A VAN ZANDT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
