Cases 11 - 20 of 54
HALE v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42142
Plaintiff:
LOUIS O. HALE
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HALE v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv41829
Plaintiff:
LOUIS O. HALE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HALE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75000
Plaintiff:
THOMAS H. HALE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70728
Plaintiff:
DEAN T. HALE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40184
Plaintiff:
EDWARD N. HALE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HALE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70729
Plaintiff:
EARNEST HALE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALE V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35079
Plaintiff:
LOUIS O. HALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
HALE v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv61230
Plaintiff:
LEONARD F. HALE, LEONARD F. HALE, LEONARD F. HALE and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HALE v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv61206
Plaintiff:
HOWARD D. HALE
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALE v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32345
Plaintiff:
EARNEST HALE
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
