Cases 21 - 30 of 2,460
SWITZER v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69009
Plaintiff:
PAUL W SWITZER
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHORT v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69082
Plaintiff:
KELLY SHORT
Defendant:
A C & S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABERNATHY v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68905
Plaintiff:
DENNIS D ABERNATHY
Defendant:
A C & S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO, THE , CHESTERTON CO, A W and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICELY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69077
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY THE , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA K. NICELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68765
Plaintiff:
BOBBY THOMPSON
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALSMAN v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv69000
Plaintiff:
BILL J ALSMAN
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPARKS v. A. C. AND S., INC et al
as 2:2010cv68952
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC , THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
ALICE REBECCA SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68963
Plaintiff:
TIM L HOWARD
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, C S R LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENTON v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68910
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E DENTON
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY , DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROSS v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68948
Plaintiff:
LOUISE CROSS
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , C S R LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
