Cases 21 - 30 of 57
VAN ZANDT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET AL
as 2:2011cv66186
Plaintiff:
FRANCE A VAN ZANDT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65568
Plaintiff:
HOWARD P WILLIAMS and BETTY A WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65138
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN H KELLEY
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NARDELLI v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64255
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY NARDELLI
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLNER et al V. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv66164
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L MILLNER and BESSIE M MILLNER
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2001cv66177
Plaintiff:
SARAH GRAHAM
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65998
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. STONE and MARY F. STONE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATRISCIANO et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65322
Plaintiff:
LOUIE E. MATRISCIANO and NANCY MATRISCIANO
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERS et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64779
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S PETERS and JANET PETERS
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65057
Plaintiff:
WALTER STONE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
