Cases 31 - 40 of 129
WILLIAMS v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79877
Plaintiff:
BARNEY EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H.K. PORTER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORMANN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76638
Plaintiff:
BARNEY A. NORMANN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv78558
Plaintiff:
LENZY BARNEY, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73098
Plaintiff:
LENZY BARNEY, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70972
Plaintiff:
BARNEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71447
Plaintiff:
BARNEY KELLY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORMANN V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35836
Plaintiff:
BARNEY A. NORMANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
BARNEY v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31195
Plaintiff:
LENZY BARNEY, JR.
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32706
Plaintiff:
BARNEY KELLY
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SWEARINGEN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34249
Plaintiff:
BARNEY E. SWEARINGEN
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
