Cases 31 - 40 of 3,103
MIRTICH v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86062
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MIRTICH
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HIMES v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86050
Plaintiff:
BARRY HIMES
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KELLER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86053
Plaintiff:
FRANK KELLER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ENO v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86090
Plaintiff:
MARY H. ENO
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SCRUGGS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86590
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY NOLAN SCRUGGS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WEHROUCH v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86109
Plaintiff:
AGNES E. WEHROUCH
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PROPST, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86585
Plaintiff:
LEE HASKELL PROPST
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARASCO v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86060
Plaintiff:
CARMAN MARASCO, JR.
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ELLIS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86561
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ELLIS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HALL, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86574
Plaintiff:
THURMAN RICHARD HALL
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.