Cases 41 - 50 of 60
ATKINS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84744
Plaintiff:
FRED ATKINS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ATKINS v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77241
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. ATKINS
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ATKINS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv73990
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH ATKINS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ATKINS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv73992
Plaintiff:
PAULINE KRONE ATKINS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ATKINS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv73991
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L. ATKINS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ATKINS v. ZURN INDSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv63630
Plaintiff:
SEAMON ATKINS and SEAMON ATKINS
Defendant:
ZURN INDSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS v. ZURN INDSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv63628
Plaintiff:
ELLIS ATKINS and ELLIS ATKINS
Defendant:
ZURN INDSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS et al
as 2:2008cv63629
Plaintiff:
ROSE ATKINS and ROSE ATKINS
Defendant:
ZURN INDSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS v. BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv74025
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL G ATKINS and RUSSELL G ATKINS
Defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv69806
Plaintiff:
HELEN ATKINS
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
