Cases 41 - 50 of 211
CASTON et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37551
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CASTON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39189
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E MATTHEWS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CORLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37743
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CORLEY, III
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66551
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEANORT v. CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65501
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW E. PEANORT, SR.
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv33790
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRAY et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63849
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LOUIS GRAY and DORSEY GRAY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv32913
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS and WILLARD E. BARTEL
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv32914
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MORVANT et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61972
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. MORVANT and GEORGIA MORVANT
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
