Cases 41 - 50 of 402
PHELPS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv38806
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL L. PHELPS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GALLIEN et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34644
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL T GALLIEN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RUSSELL et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv40127
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE H. RUSSELL , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SHELTON et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv39848
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL SHELTON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAIVD C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOLTON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37072
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL E. BOLTON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLLIER v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66402
Defendant:
3M, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
GARY RUSSELL COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THORTON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64521
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THORTON and KARON THORNTON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANCIS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65374
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL W FRANCIS and COLLEEN FRANCIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BORTLES et al v. ABEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65971
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL C. BORTLES and DOROTHEA BORTLES
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRETT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64561
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GARRETT and MARLENE GARRETT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
