Cases 41 - 50 of 169
WELLS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv50930
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WELLS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WELLS v. AMERICAN OIL CO.
as 2:2010cv42591
Plaintiff:
MILTON L WELLS
Defendant:
AMERICAN OIL CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WELLS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv42592
Plaintiff:
MILTON L WELLS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WELLS v. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80740
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WELLS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION , ACANDS, INC., FLINTKOTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80599
Plaintiff:
FRED DAVID WELLS
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79557
Plaintiff:
ALFRED D. WELLS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. ARMSTONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80645
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID WELLS
Defendant:
ARMSTONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79514
Plaintiff:
HERBERT O. WELLS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41450
Plaintiff:
DANIEL B. WELLS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WELLS et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79462
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. WELLS and FANNIE L. WELLS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
