Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 334
SCARBOROUGH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80928
Plaintiff: BOBBY GLEN SCARBOROUGH
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOEBER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51736
Plaintiff: GLEN R. LOEBER
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GLEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41189
Plaintiff: JAMES A. GLEN
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARTLEY et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80464
Plaintiff: CAROLYN SUE HARTLEY and GLEN A. HARTLEY
Defendant: ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERSON, SR. v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80117
Plaintiff: GLEN V. ROBERSON, SR.
Defendant: GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TROXELL v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv79394
Plaintiff: GLEN TROXELL
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOEBER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75879
Plaintiff: GLEN R. LOEBER
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant: JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50599
Plaintiff: GLEN E SMITH
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CHESTNUT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70033
Plaintiff: GLEN E. CHESTNUT
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A.L. PIERCE
as 2:2010cv50598
Plaintiff: GLEN E SMITH
Defendant: A.L. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?