Cases 61 - 70 of 154
CAGER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86313
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GRIFFIN CAGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86315
Defendant:
BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY J. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HART v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86316
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB A. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86318
Defendant:
VIACOM, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
E.C. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86320
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY L. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86321
Defendant:
BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JEFFERSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86325
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., VIACOM, INC., 3M and others
Plaintiff:
MARTHA J. JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86326
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, CRANE COMPANY, 3M and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK L. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86328
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY D. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNIGHT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86333
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
