Cases 61 - 70 of 599
ATKINSON v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68999
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ATKINSON
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC. , THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A W CHESTERON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUGGER v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68920
Plaintiff:
BEN T DUGGER
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68998
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , GARY A BROWNFIELD, SR , CSR LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVOL v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68909
Plaintiff:
DANDY D EVOL, SR
Defendant:
A C & S INC , CHICAGO FIREBRICK CO , DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARDMAN v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68971
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARDMAN
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , ANCHOR PACKING CO , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68981
Plaintiff:
MELBA CAMBELL SMITH
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPARKS v. A. C. AND S., INC et al
as 2:2010cv68952
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC , THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
ALICE REBECCA SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DILLLINGHAM v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68907
Plaintiff:
PAUL R DILLLINGHAM
Defendant:
A C & S INC, CHICAGO FIREBRICK CO , DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARPENTER v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68995
Plaintiff:
HUBERT CARPENTER
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPPS v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68914
Plaintiff:
JOHN E CAPPS
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY , CHEVRON U S A and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
