Cases 81 - 90 of 152
PEREZ DIAZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76887
Plaintiff:
TOMAS PEREZ DIAZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORELL-PEREZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76483
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. MORELL-PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ GONZALEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76888
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. PEREZ GONZALEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76871
Plaintiff:
ADAM E. PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76874
Plaintiff:
EUSEBIO PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72175
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv40728
Plaintiff:
RICARDO PEREZ
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PEREZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72176
Plaintiff:
EDWARD I. PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72181
Plaintiff:
RICARDO M. PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72180
Plaintiff:
MANUEL E. PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
