Cases 81 - 90 of 212
GIBSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74754
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD GIBSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IVEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75353
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD B. IVEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TASSIN et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv69447
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JOSEPH TASSIN and MILLIE K TASSIN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WISEMAN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71368
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD K. WISEMAN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TREADO v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71137
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. TREADO
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70244
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD D. DICKEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEAHY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71579
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD J. LEAHY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOSTER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70438
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD FOSTER
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLIFFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39283
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J. CLIFFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
NURSE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38551
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD P. NURSE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
