Cases 1 - 10 of 12
EDWARDS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv38333
Plaintiff:
JACK W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EDWARDS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv38330
Plaintiff:
CECIL W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EDWARDS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv04617
Plaintiff:
CECIL W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EDWARDS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv38340
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EDWARDS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56346
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
EDWARDS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74335
Plaintiff:
CECIL W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31969
Plaintiff:
CECIL W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EDWARDS et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv63491
Plaintiff:
EDWARDS W EDWARDS, EDWARDS W EDWARDS, EDWARDS W EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, MUNDET CORK CORPORATION, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EDWARDS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv81599
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD W. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDWARDS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78169
Plaintiff:
JIMMY W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
