Cases 1 - 10 of 14
DEVINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv03280
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DEVINE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , AURORA PUMP COMPANY, BIRD CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56001
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43956
Plaintiff:
RYAMOND F. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEVINE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64342
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. DEVINE and MARGARET DEVINE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITTAKER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31101
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54252
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL M. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DEVINE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52202
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. DEVINE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DEVINE v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31866
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND F. DEVINE
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DEVINE v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2008cv89656
Plaintiff:
MARITA DEVINE
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., CAREY CANADA, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEVINE v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65551
Plaintiff:
CLYDE DEVINE and CLYDE DEVINE
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
