Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MURPHY et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv55653
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C MURPHY , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURPHY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41289
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS C. MURPHY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURPHY et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv39298
Plaintiff:
ORLON C MURPHY , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURPHY et al v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61807
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. MURPHY and JANET MURPHY
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30061
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. MURPHY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
MURPHY et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84810
Plaintiff:
LAVERNE MURPHY, LAVERNE MURPHY, WILLIE C. MURPHY and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MURPHY et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv83969
Plaintiff:
LAVERNE MURPHY, LAVERNE MURPHY, WILLIE C. MURPHY and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MURPHY v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72267
Plaintiff:
LESTER C. MURPHY
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
