Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MURPHY v. CHARLES KURZ & COMPANY INC.
as 2:2011cv57686
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J MURPHY, JR
Defendant:
CHARLES KURZ & COMPANY INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURPHY v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57687
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J MURPHY, JR
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURPHY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv47387
Plaintiff:
ONNI J. MURPHY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURPHY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41855
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. MURPHY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MURPHY et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83464
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MURPHY , JULIE MURPHY , JOHN MURPHY and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , H.K. PORTER CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54352
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. MURPHY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MURPHY, JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41655
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. MURPHY, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MURPHY v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67091
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. MURPHY
Defendant:
A C & S, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARSETH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33336
Plaintiff:
ONNI J. MURPHY and ONNI J. MURPHY
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MURPHY et al v. BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv74037
Plaintiff:
BERTHA J MURPHY, KAREN M OFFERMANN, LINDA M ADAMS and others
Defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, VIACOM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
