Cases 1 - 10 of 537
DOUGHERTY et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, MICHELE A DOUGHERTY and JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, III
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, ABB, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HIMES v. A. DUIE PYLE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00665
Defendant:
YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, VIKING PUMP, INC., ABB, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RUTH F. HIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CORLEY et al v. LONG-LEWIS, INC et al
as 2:2010cv61113
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant:
LONG-LEWIS, INC, BIRMINGHAM RUBBER AND GASKET CO., INC., BILL VANN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66533
Defendant:
3M, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BERNARD LEWIS and LINDA LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2012cv30025
Plaintiff:
GIDEON G LEWIS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BARLEY v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60109
Plaintiff:
LEWIS BARLEY
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY
as 5:2011cv54099
Plaintiff:
GIDEON G. LEWIS
Defendant:
KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56146
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. LEWIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55745
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEWIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55874
Plaintiff:
VERDEL C LEWIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
