Cases 1 - 10 of 52
LINDSAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49291
Plaintiff:
BRUCE C. LINDSAY, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LINDSAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44633
Plaintiff:
MAURICE P. LINDSAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LINDSAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41428
Plaintiff:
ROBIN A. LINDSAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LINDSAY, JR. et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67171
Plaintiff:
ROY E. LINDSAY, JR. and NANCY LINDSAY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDSAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 5:2011cv45593
Plaintiff:
ROBERT B.F. LINDSAY, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LINDSAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44927
Plaintiff:
EDWARD E. LINDSAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LINDSAY et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66732
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH G. LINDSAY and EDNA G. LINDSAY
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDSAY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65458
Plaintiff:
JOHN Q LINDSAY and GLADYS LINDSAY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDSAY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60335
Plaintiff:
DANIEL E. LINDSAY and SYBLE LINDSAY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDSAY et al v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83297
Plaintiff:
GILFORD H. LINDSAY and LEONORE LINDSAY
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP., EAGLE-PICHER IND. INC., RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
