Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Belen v. McGraw Hill, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06334
Defendant:
McGraw Hill LLC, McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings LLC, Pearson Education Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Belen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pica v. Barnes & Nobble College Booksellers, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06317
Defendant:
McGraw Hill LLC, Barnes & Noble College Booksellers L.L.C., Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Pica
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Barabas v. Barnes & Noble College Booksellers, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06314
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble College Booksellers L.L.C., McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings LLC, Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Martha Barabas and Donovan Mcgee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Inclusive Access Course Materials Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2020md02946
Defendant:
McGraw Hill, LLC, Barnes & Noble College Booksellers L.L.C., McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Uchenik, Austin Warman, Bruce Puleo and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Martha Barabas
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Alexandra Pelletier, M. Samantha Pak and Joan Padden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cabral v. Cengage Learning, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv03660
Defendant:
Cengage Learning, Inc, McGraw Hill LLC, Educational Publishers Enforcement Group and others
Plaintiff:
David Cabral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at
Uchenik v. McGraw Hill, LLC (f/k/a McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03162
Defendant:
Cengage Learning, Inc., Pearson Education, Inc., Educational Publishers Enforcement Group and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Uchenik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Book Dog Books, LLC v. Cengage Learning, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06413
Plaintiff:
Book Dog Books, LLC and SPL Management, LLC
Defendant:
Cengage Learning, Inc. and Pearson Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
