Cases 41 - 48 of 48
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of Texas et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06625
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harpercollins Publishers, LLC, Simon & Schuster, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF OHIO et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
as 1:2002cv01080
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Covad Comm Co, et al v. Bell Atl Corp, et al
as 02-7057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Covad Communications Company and Dieca Communications, Inc., doing business as Covad Communications Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Bell Atlantic Corporation, Bell Atlantic-Washington, DC, Inc., Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc. and others
Appellee:
Arthur Andersen LLP
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Communications Workers of America, BellSouth Corporation, SBC Communications Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Z-Tel Communications, Inc., AT&T Corporation, Association for Local Telecommunications Services and others
Terminated Party:
CoreComm Holdco, Inc., District of Columbia, State of West Virginia and others
Amicus Curiae:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
