Cases 1 - 6 of 6
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG et al
as 1:2019cv02232
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant:
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP., T-MOBILE US, INC., DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEW AMERICA'S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, HAL SINGER, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Petitioner:
NTCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01878
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
STATE OF OHIO et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
as 1:2002cv01080
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
