Cases 11 - 20 of 22
ARCHBOLD v. BRUNSWICK BANCORP et al
as 2:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK BANCORP , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Rivello v. Mifflinburg Bank and Trust et al
as 3:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Gerald Rosario Rivello, Jr.
Defendant:
Mifflinburg Bank and Trust , John Does 1-10 and X,Y,Z Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARCHBOLD v. VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP et al
as 2:2010cv06796
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP , VALLEY NATIONAL BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ARCHBOLD v. COMMUNITY BANK et al
as 2:2010cv04753
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
COMMUNITY BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
ARCHIBOLD v. OLDPOINT NATIONAL BANK et al
as 2:2010cv04689
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHIBOLD
Defendant:
OLDPOINT NATIONAL BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
ARCHBOLD v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04541
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and X, Y, Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
PRATER-McCOULLUM v. CHERRY HILL KIA & DODGE et al
as 2:2009cv01353
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER-McCOULLUM
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL KIA & DODGE, FAULKE, P.J. VINCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kibbie v. BP/Citibank et al
as 3:2008cv01804
Plaintiff:
Julie Lynette Kibbie
Defendant:
BP/Citibank, Citgo/Citibank, Equifax and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MACKIE et al v. HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MACKIE and ELYCE MACKIE
Defendant:
HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL INC., HOUSEHOLD REALTY CORP., HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
