Cases 31 - 40 of 1,085
Gengcai Tian v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Gengcai Tian
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,, Bank of America, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Stephanie Mayes v. Capital One, N.A.
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Mayes
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Michael Steele v. Bank of America, National Association
as 5:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Michael Steele
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hatch v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
as 5:2023cv06717
Plaintiff:
Bradford Hatch
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
Tian v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Gengcai Tian
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Champion v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv05989
Plaintiff:
Jean Champion
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Michael Plotkowski and Robert J. Plotkowski
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Guzzo v. Mason McDuffie Mortgage Co. et al
as 3:2023cv05788
Plaintiff:
Libby Guzzo
Defendant:
Mason McDuffie Mortgage Co., Adam Rosen, Greenbox Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tang v. First Republic Bank et al
as 3:2023cv06607
Plaintiff:
Gloria Tang
Defendant:
First Republic Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for First Republic Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks (Finley-Calip) v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2023cv05252
Plaintiff:
LaTonya R. Brooks (Finley-Calip)
Defendant:
County of Alameda, T. Rosalind, D. Pascoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Bank Of America
as 4:2023cv05042
Plaintiff:
LaTonya R. Brooks
Defendant:
Bank Of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
