Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Mendez Internet Management Services, Inc., et al v. Banco Santander de Puerto Rico, et al
as 3:2008cv02140
Plaintiff:
Mendez Internet Management Services, Inc., Mendez Internet Management Services, Inc., James Mendez and others
Defendant:
Banco Santander de Puerto Rico, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Doral Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nieves-Rivera v. Gerente del Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Sucursal Mr Special de San Sebastian
as 3:2008cv02036
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Nieves-Rivera
Defendant:
Gerente del Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Sucursal Mr Special de San Sebastian
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nieves-Rivera v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
as 3:2008cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Nieves-Rivera
Defendant:
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nieves-Rivera v. Visa del Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
as 3:2008cv02035
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Nieves-Rivera
Defendant:
Visa del Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez-Vazquez v. Doral Bank & Doral Financial Corp.
as 3:2008cv01808
Plaintiff:
Luis Arturo Rodriguez-Vazquez
Defendant:
Doral Bank & Doral Financial Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santa-Cruz et al v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2008cv01225
Plaintiff:
Venancio Marti Santa-Cruz, Julita Soler-Vila, Conjugal Partnership Santa-Soler and others
Defendant:
Banco Santander Puerto Rico, Santander Securities Inc., Fernando Gallardo-Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cordova-Medina et al v. FirstBank Puerto Rico
as 3:2007cv01766
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Cordova-Medina, Jose A. Cordova-Medina, Justina Burgos and others
Defendant:
FirstBank Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Pizarro-Matias v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2006cv01225
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
