Cases 1 - 10 of 22
PAGE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00104
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. PAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
STATE OF ALASKA v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALASKA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
WYTHE COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00719
Plaintiff:
WYTHE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
GRAYSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00718
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF MICHIGAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv01938
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
HARRELL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01566
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
GLENN F. MCCONNELL and ROBERT W. HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01836
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
HARRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01454
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
