Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Umeco, Inc. et al v. ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SERVICE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2009cv02171
Plaintiff:
Umeco, Inc., PAYTRIX CORPORATION and FBS COMERCIALES, INC.
Defendant:
ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SERVICE CORPORATION, Ismael Colon, ERI GUZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Betancourt v. Vigoritto et al
as 3:2007cv01851
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Betancourt
Defendant:
Alfred P. Vigoritto, Sally Vigoritto, FNU Minaghan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Westernbank Puerto Rico v. Kachkar et al
as 3:2007cv01606
Plaintiff:
Westernbank Puerto Rico and Westernbank Puerto Rico
Defendant:
Jack Kachkar, Steve Handley, Colin Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Garcia-Monagas et al v. W. Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01217
Plaintiff:
Jorge Garcia-Monagas, Diego Garcia-Monagas and Giselda Garcia-Monagas
Defendant:
W. Holding Company, Inc., Ileana Garcia-Ramirez de Arellano, Fredeswinda Garcia-Ramirez de Arellano and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cruz-Ricart et al v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01093
Plaintiff:
Isabel Cruz-Ricart, Isabel B. Soto-Cruz, Humberto R. Soto-Cruz and others
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc., Insurance Company X,Y,Z, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PRAICO, et al v. Burgos-Diaz, et al
as 3:2001cv01186
Defendant:
John Encarnacion-De-Garci, Conjugal Partnership Encarnacion-De-Garcia, John Tosado-Ortiz and others
Special Master:
Carlos F. Varcarcel-Maura
Plaintiff:
Puerto Rican American Insurance Company, All Plaintiffs, National Insurance Company and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Mariluz Cruz-Marrero
Interested Party:
Oriental Bank & Trust, R-G Premier Bank of PR, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
