Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Engwall et al v. Tinsley et al
as 8:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Dean Trew, Neal Engwall, Christie Sikora and others
Defendant:
Bobby Tinsley, Brian Quimby, Skuxchange, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. TOMASINO et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA and STEPHEN P WALLACE
Defendant:
JOHN A TOMASINO, COLE SCOTT AND KISSANE PA, CARLOS H GAMBOA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Birmingham et al v. Rofx.net et al
as 1:2021cv23472
Counter Defendant:
Ryan Birmingham, Roman Leonov, Mitchell Parent and others
Defendant:
ROFX.NET, AURO ADVANTAGES LLC, AWARE CHOICE LTD. and others
Counter Claimant:
STANISLAV KHOMENKO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Francois v. Hatami et al
as 1:2021cv22528
Plaintiff:
Charite Francois
Defendant:
Mazyer Hatami, ATM Shipping Corp., Mike Hatami and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv80896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
v. Keppel et al
as 8:2020cv02994
Defendant:
Charles Keppel, Jr, Sheriff Christopher Nocco, John Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Keppel v. Nocco et al
as 8:2020cv03003
Defendant:
Sheriff Christopher Nocco, John Collier, Stacy Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Keppel, Jr and Charles Keppel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gordon Food Service, Inc. v. Price IV et al
as 6:2020cv02273
Defendant:
Nicholas W Armstrong, Curtis Devane, Scott E Gwartney and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Food Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
v. Price Armstrong, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv02272
Defendant:
Nicholas W Armstrong, Curtis Devane, E Scott Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
