Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Catawba Nation v. Endo Health Solutions, Inc., et al
as 1:2020op45234
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Anda, Inc., Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Catawba Nation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019op46095
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Mylan Specialty, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Township of Barnegat v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD et al
as 1:2019op45925
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Advantage Logistics, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Township of Barnega and Township of Bernegat
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Klamath Tribes v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45786
Defendant:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,, Beverly Sackler, Advantage Logistics and others
Plaintiff:
Klamath Tribes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kentucky River District Health Department v. Actavis LLC et al
as 1:2019op45050
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kentucky River District Health Department, and all others similarly situated, and Kentucky River District Health Department
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Auglaize County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45570
Plaintiff:
Auglaize County Board of County Commissioners
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Logan County Commission v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2018op45000
Plaintiff:
Logan County Commission
Defendant:
Cardinal Health Inc. , McKesson Corporation , AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
