Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lyons et al v. Atlanta Escrow & Exchange Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Lyons and Katherine M. Lyons
Defendant:
Atlanta Escrow & Exchange Service, Inc., Allied Business Solutions, Inc., Leonardo Salinas Beltrones and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Croxton v. Durden et al
as 6:2020cv00078
Defendant:
J. Shay Kelly Durden and Lauraby Shannon Keith
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mara Kelly Croxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
El v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kwasi El and Christopher Lanier Hudson
Defendant:
Donald Howse, Brandon Sparks, Wendy Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Parten v. PERRY et al
as 1:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
RONALD PARTEN
Defendant:
EDGAR PERRY, RAYMOND BITTNER, JEANETTE BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Bank of Dawson et al v. Aero-Space Reports, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00154
Plaintiff:
Bank of Dawson , First State Bank - Americus and Bank of Terrell
Defendant:
Aero-Space Reports, Inc. , Kellie Price and Sid Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
First Service Mortgage, Inc. et al v. King et al
as 1:2010cv01746
Plaintiff:
First Service Mortgage, Inc., Purnell Investments and Tony D. Bryant
Defendant:
Kelly S. King , Marlot B. Perry and Brian P. Henley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kinnard v. Kelly et al
as 1:2008cv01824
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Kinnard
Defendant:
Robert Kelly, Rowe Entertainment Inc., Leonard Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adventure Outdoors, Inc. et al v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2006cv02897
Plaintiff:
Adventure Outdoors, Inc., Adventure Outdoors, Inc., Wallace and Wallace, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, Michael Bloomberg, Michael Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
