Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in Louisiana
Catron et al v. Rogul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00037
Plaintiff: Stephen B. Catron and Pinnacle View Consulting LLC
Defendant: Andrew J. Rogul, Kevin M. Ward and K.M. Ward Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Romious v. Brooks and Associates, Inc./Realtors et al
as 2:2011cv02790
Plaintiff: Carlos Romious
Defendant: Brooks and Associates, Inc./Realtors, Chris Brooks, Thomas Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadad v. Brooks and Associates, Inc./Realtors et al
as 2:2011cv02789
Plaintiff: Zanab Hadad
Defendant: Brooks and Associates, Inc./Realtors, Chris Brooks, Thomas Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romious v. Cornell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02791
Plaintiff: Carlos Romious
Defendant: Brian Cornell, Brooks and Associates, Inc./Realtors, Chris Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newpark Drilling Fluids, L.L.C. v. Mid-South Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03534
Plaintiff: Newpark Drilling Fluids, L.L.C., Newpark Drilling Fluids, L.L.C. and Newpark Drilling Fluids, L.L.C.
Defendant: Mid-South Services, Inc., Larry Collins, Woodwell Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gary et al v. New England Patriots et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01002
Plaintiff: Willie Gary, Kevin Hacker, Peter Trout and others
Defendant: New England Patriots, New England Patriots Limited Partnership and Bill Belichick
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Abraham, et al v. Singh, et al
as 2:2004cv00044
Plaintiff: Rajeswara Rao Jami, Davis Mathai Puthussery, Abraham Dowrla and others
Defendant: Labor Consultants International, Falcon Steel Structures, Terry Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?