Cases 1 - 7 of 7
City of Clarksdale, Mississippi et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03316
Plaintiff:
City of Clarksdale, Mississippi and City of Holly Springs, Mississippi
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
La Mesa-Spring Valley School District
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bullock County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Bullock County, Alabama, Chilton County, Alabama, City of Auburn, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Coral Springs v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03888
Plaintiff:
City of Coral Springs
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vaghashia Family Limited Partnership et al v. Prashant Vaghashia et al
as 2:2019cv01876
Defendant:
Mita Vaghashia, Nidhi Vaghashia, Vaghashia Family Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman Oaks First Plaza, LLC and Vaghashia Family Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carrasco et al v. Horwitz et al
as 3:2014cv01645
Plaintiff:
Jorge Anthony Carrasco and Nancy Jean Carrasco
Defendant:
Stanley Ivan Horwitz , Anita Horwitz , The Star Spring Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
