Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in New Jersey
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-00687
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff: BLUEBERRY FUNDING, LLC
Defendant: LEOR MOSHE, EMUNAH MOSHE, JUDY MOSHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION et al v. SMITH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08761
Plaintiff: ROCHE DIABETES CARE, INC. and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Cross Defendant: MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P., KESMAN HUGHES & COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant: SAHILY PAOLINE, MERCATO PARTNERS GROWTH II, L.P., MERCATO PARTNERS INGRAM CO-INVEST, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: JEFFREY C. SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff: ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.
Special Master: THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
Interested Party: Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
3Rd Party Defendant: EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY D/B/A EXPRESS SCRIPTS, CVS CAREMARK, XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Managers 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MERS HOLDING, LLC v. STANDARD POWER OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv05971
Plaintiff: MERS HOLDING, LLC
Defendant: STANDARD POWER OF AMERICA, INC. , RICHARD HARDING , MATTHEW ROUNDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KOREAN COMMUNITY CHURCH OF NEW JERSEY UNITED METHODIST v. CHO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04333
Plaintiff: KOREAN COMMUNITY CHURCH OF NEW JERSEY UNITED METHODIST
Defendant: HEUNG SUN CHO , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-250 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
COASTAL SHEET METAL CORP. et al v. VASSALLO et al
as 2:2007cv02745
Plaintiff: COASTAL SHEET METAL CORP. and LAURENCE KUPFERSCHMID
Defendant: HARRY VASSALLO, KAREN VASSALLO, COASTAL SUN METALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?