Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. USA
as 1:2016cv00531
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Clifford B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chen v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv03903
Petitioner: Kou Chen
Interested Party: Attorney Stuart J Grossman and Attorney Benjamin B. Xue
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. USA
as 6:2013cv06070
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Charles B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. USA
as 6:2013cv06069
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Charles B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. USA
as 6:2013cv06067
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Charles B. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ohle v. United States Of America
as 1:2013cv00450
Petitioner: John B. Ohle, III
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03336
Petitioner: Ozem B. Thomas
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ohle v. USA
as 1:2012cv01909
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John B. Ohle, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Karron v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01874
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Daniel B. Karron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gil-Reyes v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv05310
Petitioner: Franklin B. Gil-Reyes
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?