Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Robert Stoltz v. D. Neven, et al
as 17-17315
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT STOLTZ
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Arie Redeker v. D. Neven, et al
as 17-16917
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARIE ROBERT REDEKER
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Ernest Carpenter v. D. Neven, et al
as 17-16865
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST DEAN CARPENTER
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Thomas Morales v. D. Neven, et al
as 17-15187
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jesse Voss v. D. Neven, et al
as 16-16794
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE RAYMOND VOSS
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Cruz v. Neven et al
as 2:2016cv02335
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Jose Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott Kevari v. D. Neven, et al
as 16-16406
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT ALLEN KEVARI
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Helfrich v. Neven et al
as 2:2016cv01499
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Peter J. Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv02050
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Lesean Taurs Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warenback v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv01789
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Douglas Harry Warenback
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
