Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Lawrence v. Kluewer et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Petitioner:
David Lawrence
Respondent:
Susan T. Kluewer, Michael J. Sposato and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pierre-Louis v. John Doe
as 1:2016cv08344
Plaintiff:
Harrison F. Pierre-Louis
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. DuBois et al
as 1:2016cv07085
Petitioner:
Constance Mitchell
Respondent:
Carl DuBois , Orange County Correctional Facility , Christopher Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ojo v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv04112
Aid Name (s) Being Fictitious, The Intent Of Plaintiff Being To Designate Female Correctional Offic:
Jane Doe #1
Aid Name(s) Being Fictitious, The Intent Of Plaintiff Being To Designate Male Correctional Officer:
John Doe #1-8
Plaintiff:
Olukayode David Ojo
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Vallen v. Hall et al
as 2:2016cv02893
Defendant:
Jane & John Doe, Carol Hall, Gorden May and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Vallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. DuBois et al
as 1:2016cv03190
Petitioner:
Shujat Ali
Respondent:
Carl DuBois , Christopher Shanahan , John Doe Acting Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Herrera v. John Doe
as 1:2015cv09105
Petitioner:
Jose Herrera
Respondent:
John Doe and Attorney General of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNeil v. New York City et al
as 1:2014cv09735
Petitioner:
Babu J. McNeil
Respondent:
New York City, John Doe and Joseph Ponte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McNeil v. New York City et al
as 1:2014cv08779
Petitioner:
Babu J. McNeil
Respondent:
New York City, John Doe, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McNeil v. New York City et al
as 1:2014cv03005
Petitioner:
Babu J. McNeil
Respondent:
New York City, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
