Cases 31 - 40 of 96
HEAD v. SMITH
as 1:2015cv00397
Petitioner:
JOHN LAMONT HEAD
Respondent:
WILLIAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEAD v. SMITH
as 1:2015cv00189
Petitioner:
JOHN LAMONT HEAD
Respondent:
WILLIAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 1:2014cv02180
Petitioner:
ADRIAN O'NEILL ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DIRECTOR OF THE USPTO, MARGARET PEGGY FOCARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HERNDON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01929
Petitioner:
JOHN K. HERNDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2013cv01162
Petitioner:
TYE J. SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN DAVIS, COLORADO STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERNDON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv00310
Petitioner:
JOHN K. HERNDON
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEMOS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHAMPION v. HOLT
as 1:2012cv01780
Petitioner:
JOHN A. CHAMPION
Respondent:
RONNIE R. HOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MONTAGNE et al v. ERICKSEN et al
as 1:2012cv00369
Petitioner:
BRADFORD JOHN MONTAGNE and TERI LYNN MONTAGNE
Respondent:
RALPH R. ERICKSEN and JOAN N. ERICKSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv00085
Petitioner:
JOHN WILSON
Respondent:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
