Cases 31 - 40 of 122
James v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 0:2007cv60556
Petitioner:
Kenneth James
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBOJES v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00423
Petitioner:
ANDREAS OBOJES
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBOJES v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00412
Petitioner:
ANDREAS OBOJES
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00176
Petitioner:
LINDON JERROLD WHITE
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HONRINE v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2007cv00227
Petitioner:
FRED EUGENE HONRINE
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MATTON v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00388
Petitioner:
RONALD LEE MATTON
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOYNER v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00165
Petitioner:
MORRIS B JOYNER
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANHEIDEN v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00212
Petitioner:
THOMAS L VANHEIDEN
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIARKIEWICZ v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00383
Petitioner:
JASON SIARKIEWICZ
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACOBS v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00378
Petitioner:
BRYCE DONALD JACOBS
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
