Cases 41 - 50 of 148
CORPUS v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
as 4:2017cv00458
Petitioner:
ANDREW CORPUS
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neff v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv14213
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Dallas Andrew Neff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tennant v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00866
Petitioner:
David Andrew Tennant
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDREW v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2017cv00206
Petitioner:
BILLY D ANDREW
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDREW v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2017cv00112
Petitioner:
BILLY D ANDREW
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00233
Petitioner:
Andrew Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2017cv00285
Petitioner:
Andrew Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SULLIVAN v. JONES
as 1:2017cv00017
Petitioner:
GARY ANDREW SULLIVAN
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00100
Petitioner:
Andrew Lee Rogers
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neff v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv14003
Plaintiff:
Dallas Andrew Neff
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
