Cases 41 - 50 of 7,348
Campbell v. Wills
as 3:2024cv01999
Petitioner:
Caleb Campbell
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDuffie v. Rock Island County
as 4:2024cv04158
Respondent:
Rock Island County
Petitioner:
Yolanduis L. McDuffie
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weems v. Sproul et al
as 3:2024cv01691
Petitioner:
Tony Weems
Respondent:
Patricia Cushwa, D. Sproul and Scott Kubic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vivirito v. States of America
as 1:2024cv07540
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Thomas Vivirito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Hanks v. Greene
as 1:2024cv07553
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Petitioner:
Edward Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howleit v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01955
Petitioner:
Tysean Howleit
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strother v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01932
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Reginald Strother
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beard v. McDannald
as 1:2024cv01291
Respondent:
Joshua McDannald
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Alexander V Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Warden of FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
James McKinney
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sterk v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01287
Respondent:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and Danielle Smith
Petitioner:
Marilyn Sterk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
