General Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Scott v. Firkus We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04954
Plaintiff: Lawrence Scott
Defendant: Gregory P. Firkus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hammond v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv03188
Petitioner: Jesse Lee Hammond
Respondent: Michael P Randle and Jerry Buscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keller v. Sherrod We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00478
Petitioner: Chad P Keller
Respondent: W A Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hammond v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv03144
Petitioner: Jesse Lee Hammond
Respondent: Michael P Randle and Buscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Randle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv03434
Petitioner: Jesse Charles Phillips
Respondent: Michael P. Randle, Lee Ryker and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barmore v. Randle et al
as 1:2010cv50090
Petitioner: Keith D. Barmore
Respondent: Michael P. Randle and Randy J Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barmore v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv50090
Petitioner: Keith D. Barmore
Respondent: Michael P. Randle and Randy J Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laughlin v. Gaetz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01956
Plaintiff: Cornelius P. Laughlin
Defendant: Donald Gaetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barmore v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv00219
Petitioner: Keith D. Barmore
Respondent: Michael P. Randle and Randy J Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Randle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01549
Petitioner: De'Markus Bailey
Respondent: Michael P. Randle and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?