General Cases filed in Florida
SHARP v. INCH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00289
Petitioner: KEITH MAURICE SHARP
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EEDIE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01391
Respondent: Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner: William Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2017cv00263
Petitioner: James Anthony Sharp
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHARPE v. CREWS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00550
Petitioner: ALVIN SHARPE
Respondent: MICHAEL CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHARP v. ENGLISH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00110
Petitioner: CHARLES T SHARP, JR
Respondent: N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sharpe v. Butler
as 1:2013cv20891
Plaintiff: Camille M. Sharpe
Defendant: Sandra Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SHARP v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00372
Petitioner: SYLVIA SHARP
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sharpe v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv14196
Plaintiff: Kevin Sharpe
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHARP v. MCDONOUGH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv00017
Petitioner: KENTA SHARP
Respondent: JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?